ClouDonnaClouDonna
Cost and Value Lab

Wo Kosten und Architektur wirklich zusammenhängen

Ein realistisches Szenario, kein Preisrechner. Sehen Sie, was Kosten treibt, was vergleichbar ist, und was nicht.

Illustratives Beispiel

Data platform for a mid-size enterprise

15 TB of governed data300 BI users50 data engineersGrowing AI workloadsSAP integration requiredEU data residency required

Was hier Kosten treibt

Compute for AI workloads

The largest and least predictable driver once AI workloads scale beyond pilots.

Data movement

Moving data across regions or platforms to satisfy residency requirements adds cost that's easy to underestimate.

User concurrency

300 BI users querying concurrently drives compute differently than a smaller, steadier workload.

Integration complexity

SAP integration depth changes implementation cost more than the platform choice itself.

Wie Plattformen diese Kosten unterschiedlich tragen

SAP Business Data Cloud

Risikoexposition: mostly fixed
Verpflichtung
Bundled with existing SAP commercial agreements, less exposure to standalone consumption spikes.
Datenbewegung
Lowest data movement cost for SAP-native data, since it stays close to source.
Betrieb
Lower operations overhead, more of the platform is managed.

Databricks

Risikoexposition: mostly variable
Verpflichtung
Consumption-based; AI workload growth directly drives spend unless actively governed.
Datenbewegung
Moderate, depends on source system proximity to the chosen cloud region.
Betrieb
Higher operations overhead, more configuration and tuning responsibility.

Snowflake

Risikoexposition: mixed
Verpflichtung
Credit-based consumption with optional capacity commitments that reduce unit cost.
Datenbewegung
Moderate, cross-cloud data sharing can add movement cost.
Betrieb
Lower operations overhead for core analytics; AI workloads add more.

Microsoft Fabric

Risikoexposition: mixed
Verpflichtung
Capacity-based pricing; needs sizing before commitment to avoid over- or under-provisioning.
Datenbewegung
Lowest if already inside the Microsoft ecosystem, higher if not.
Betrieb
Lower operations overhead where Microsoft tooling is already standard.

Was nicht direkt vergleichbar ist

  • List prices alone, without factoring in existing commercial agreements and discounts
  • AI compute costs across platforms without a defined workload profile, since usage patterns vary widely
  • Implementation cost estimates without a validated integration scope

Modellieren Sie Ihr eigenes Szenario

Ein echter Decision Sprint baut dieses Modell aus Ihren tatsächlichen Verträgen und Ihrer Nutzung, nicht aus einer generischen Schätzung.

Mit Donna starten