ClouDonnaClouDonna
Cost and Value Lab

Là où le coût et l'architecture se rejoignent vraiment

Un scénario réaliste, pas un calculateur de prix. Découvrez ce qui pilote le coût, ce qui est comparable, et ce qui ne l'est pas.

Exemple illustratif

Data platform for a mid-size enterprise

15 TB of governed data300 BI users50 data engineersGrowing AI workloadsSAP integration requiredEU data residency required

Ce qui pilote le coût ici

Compute for AI workloads

The largest and least predictable driver once AI workloads scale beyond pilots.

Data movement

Moving data across regions or platforms to satisfy residency requirements adds cost that's easy to underestimate.

User concurrency

300 BI users querying concurrently drives compute differently than a smaller, steadier workload.

Integration complexity

SAP integration depth changes implementation cost more than the platform choice itself.

Comment chaque plateforme porte ce coût différemment

SAP Business Data Cloud

Exposition: mostly fixed
Engagement
Bundled with existing SAP commercial agreements, less exposure to standalone consumption spikes.
Mouvement de données
Lowest data movement cost for SAP-native data, since it stays close to source.
Exploitation
Lower operations overhead, more of the platform is managed.

Databricks

Exposition: mostly variable
Engagement
Consumption-based; AI workload growth directly drives spend unless actively governed.
Mouvement de données
Moderate, depends on source system proximity to the chosen cloud region.
Exploitation
Higher operations overhead, more configuration and tuning responsibility.

Snowflake

Exposition: mixed
Engagement
Credit-based consumption with optional capacity commitments that reduce unit cost.
Mouvement de données
Moderate, cross-cloud data sharing can add movement cost.
Exploitation
Lower operations overhead for core analytics; AI workloads add more.

Microsoft Fabric

Exposition: mixed
Engagement
Capacity-based pricing; needs sizing before commitment to avoid over- or under-provisioning.
Mouvement de données
Lowest if already inside the Microsoft ecosystem, higher if not.
Exploitation
Lower operations overhead where Microsoft tooling is already standard.

Ce qui n'est pas directement comparable

  • List prices alone, without factoring in existing commercial agreements and discounts
  • AI compute costs across platforms without a defined workload profile, since usage patterns vary widely
  • Implementation cost estimates without a validated integration scope

Modélisez votre propre scénario

Un vrai Decision Sprint construit ce modèle à partir de vos contrats et de votre usage réels, pas d'une estimation générique.

Commencer avec Donna